Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Level Gear"
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
--[[User:DaveGarber1975|Dave Garber]] 01:47, 7 February 2007 (CST) | --[[User:DaveGarber1975|Dave Garber]] 01:47, 7 February 2007 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | In any case, it's awfully dang easy to change and change back again with these Templates. I love 'em! Three cheers for MooNFisH!!! --[[User:DaveGarber1975|Dave Garber]] 02:00, 7 February 2007 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Ok, how about this? Level Gear as a subcategory of Statistic gear. A link from the template to [[:Category:Statistic Gear|Stat & Level Gear]]. In there, the subcategory Level Gear shoud be clearly visible. But it's pointless to link to both Stat and Level gear separately from the template. --[[User:MooNFisH|Llanor]] 05:09, 7 February 2007 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::I favor putting these categories in parallel as they are, rather than putting one category underneath the other category. But, that's my personal preference and I may be a bit crazy. Waite and I (poor Waite! *lol*) had a similar difference of opinion about the Spellcasting Gear category. Click [[:Category_talk: Spellcasting Gear |here]] to see our discussion. --[[User:DaveGarber1975|Dave Garber]] 15:28, 7 February 2007 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::I played around with it this way for a bit and, to me, it doesn't seem like an improvement in how things are organized. Ummm, I feel kinda bad for doing this but will it drive you nuts if I change it back again? *crosses fingers* --[[User:DaveGarber1975|Dave Garber]] 16:09, 7 February 2007 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::It woudln't, but next time if something hasn't been consented we'd best just discuss first, instead of change first. Or not? --[[User:MooNFisH|Llanor]] 18:37, 7 February 2007 (CST) | ||
Latest revision as of 19:37, 7 February 2007
Yes, offhand, the Statistic Gear category makes this Level Gear category a bit redundant. However...
People talk about "level gear" all the time on the MUD. When they come here, I think that they ought to be able to find a page or category entitled "level gear." Nobody would think to look for "statistic gear" offhand.
However, str gear and dex gear are definitely not considered "level gear" and I thought that it would be techincally inaccurate to include them under this category; however, I thought that all five deserved to be in a single category, which is why I put all five under Statistic Gear.
So, I thought that a little redundancy would be advantageous in this case. What do you think?
--Dave Garber 01:47, 7 February 2007 (CST)
In any case, it's awfully dang easy to change and change back again with these Templates. I love 'em! Three cheers for MooNFisH!!! --Dave Garber 02:00, 7 February 2007 (CST)
- Ok, how about this? Level Gear as a subcategory of Statistic gear. A link from the template to Stat & Level Gear. In there, the subcategory Level Gear shoud be clearly visible. But it's pointless to link to both Stat and Level gear separately from the template. --Llanor 05:09, 7 February 2007 (CST)
- I favor putting these categories in parallel as they are, rather than putting one category underneath the other category. But, that's my personal preference and I may be a bit crazy. Waite and I (poor Waite! *lol*) had a similar difference of opinion about the Spellcasting Gear category. Click here to see our discussion. --Dave Garber 15:28, 7 February 2007 (CST)
- I played around with it this way for a bit and, to me, it doesn't seem like an improvement in how things are organized. Ummm, I feel kinda bad for doing this but will it drive you nuts if I change it back again? *crosses fingers* --Dave Garber 16:09, 7 February 2007 (CST)
- It woudln't, but next time if something hasn't been consented we'd best just discuss first, instead of change first. Or not? --Llanor 18:37, 7 February 2007 (CST)
