Difference between revisions of "User talk:Flowery"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "Differing opinions are nice, and I did incorporate some changes into the existing page (eg. Draconians are definitely bad at stealth), but there is an ongoing talk page for steal...") |
WinterRose (talk | contribs) |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Differing opinions are nice, and I did incorporate some changes into the existing page ( | + | Differing opinions are nice, and I did incorporate some changes into the existing page (e.g., Draconians are definitely bad at stealth), but there is an ongoing talk page for stealth mods. Please participate there before you hack and slash on the page. --[[User:Mekrith|Mekrith]] 05:44, 22 December 2011 (CST) |
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | If I wanted to join a subcommittee, I would. The correct usage is "e.g.,". I have made the edit to your post. Feel free to revert it. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Enjoy lording over the fiefdom of racial stealth. -- [[User:Flowery|Flowery]] 08:17, 22 December 2011 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I guess you're not familiar with what a wiki is. You can consult the helpfiles in that case. --[[User:Mekrith|Mekrith]] 20:08, 22 December 2011 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Or maybe I'm very familiar with what a wiki is. '''He with the most time wins.''' -- [[User:Flowery|Flowery]] 06:49, 23 December 2011 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : ...because wiki editing is a game to be won. Are you serious? Zaffer, either contribute or do not, but if you do follow the guidelines we all adhere to. --[[User:WinterRose|WinterRose]] 06:00, 23 December 2011 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :: Guidelines that we all adhere to?? You mean, like how the changes (most of them) I make get reverted (and then put in again with just as much explanation)?? I should've put something in the talk page saying how I didn't feel like testing it, but made the changes to the table anyways??? Come on! It's a freakin' wiki. If people had to write books for every change... well, you'd end up with about three people contributing (which is almost how it is now). Anyways, I can't delete the account, but I'll go back to living in obscurity and not contributing since I can't follow your precious guidelines. Oh, by the way... you may want to think of changing your naming conventions... unless you want all your alts to stick out like sore thumbs. Even those that are 125+. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :: So long, AvatarWiki! -- [[User:Flowery|Flowery]] 07:20 CST | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::: If by you living in obscurity we will be spared of "Eragora. Eragora. Eragora. Deep gnomes love Eragora.", then by all means. As for my own naming of my own alts, I couldn't care less about your opinion on that either. But, as always, you're welcome to voice it to those three that pay attention. So long! -- [[User:WinterRose|WinterRose]] 06:30, 23 December 2011 (CST) | ||
Latest revision as of 07:30, 23 December 2011
Differing opinions are nice, and I did incorporate some changes into the existing page (e.g., Draconians are definitely bad at stealth), but there is an ongoing talk page for stealth mods. Please participate there before you hack and slash on the page. --Mekrith 05:44, 22 December 2011 (CST)
If I wanted to join a subcommittee, I would. The correct usage is "e.g.,". I have made the edit to your post. Feel free to revert it.
Enjoy lording over the fiefdom of racial stealth. -- Flowery 08:17, 22 December 2011 (EST)
I guess you're not familiar with what a wiki is. You can consult the helpfiles in that case. --Mekrith 20:08, 22 December 2011 (CST)
Or maybe I'm very familiar with what a wiki is. He with the most time wins. -- Flowery 06:49, 23 December 2011 (EST)
- ...because wiki editing is a game to be won. Are you serious? Zaffer, either contribute or do not, but if you do follow the guidelines we all adhere to. --WinterRose 06:00, 23 December 2011 (CST)
- Guidelines that we all adhere to?? You mean, like how the changes (most of them) I make get reverted (and then put in again with just as much explanation)?? I should've put something in the talk page saying how I didn't feel like testing it, but made the changes to the table anyways??? Come on! It's a freakin' wiki. If people had to write books for every change... well, you'd end up with about three people contributing (which is almost how it is now). Anyways, I can't delete the account, but I'll go back to living in obscurity and not contributing since I can't follow your precious guidelines. Oh, by the way... you may want to think of changing your naming conventions... unless you want all your alts to stick out like sore thumbs. Even those that are 125+.
- So long, AvatarWiki! -- Flowery 07:20 CST
- If by you living in obscurity we will be spared of "Eragora. Eragora. Eragora. Deep gnomes love Eragora.", then by all means. As for my own naming of my own alts, I couldn't care less about your opinion on that either. But, as always, you're welcome to voice it to those three that pay attention. So long! -- WinterRose 06:30, 23 December 2011 (CST)
