Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Level Gear"

From AvatarWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
m
Line 12: Line 12:
  
 
:Ok, how about this? Level Gear as a subcategory of Statistic gear. A link from the template to [[:Category:Statistic Gear|Stat & Level Gear]]. In there, the subcategory Level Gear shoud be clearly visible. But it's pointless to link to both Stat and Level gear separately from the template. --[[User:MooNFisH|Llanor]] 05:09, 7 February 2007 (CST)
 
:Ok, how about this? Level Gear as a subcategory of Statistic gear. A link from the template to [[:Category:Statistic Gear|Stat & Level Gear]]. In there, the subcategory Level Gear shoud be clearly visible. But it's pointless to link to both Stat and Level gear separately from the template. --[[User:MooNFisH|Llanor]] 05:09, 7 February 2007 (CST)
 +
 +
::I favor putting these categories in parallel as they are, rather than putting one category underneath the other category.  But, that's my personal preference and I may be a bit crazy.  Waite and I had a similar difference of opinion about the [[:Category_talk: Spellcasting Gear |Spellcasting Gear]] category.  --[[User:DaveGarber1975|Dave Garber]] 15:28, 7 February 2007 (CST)

Revision as of 16:28, 7 February 2007

Yes, offhand, the Statistic Gear category makes this Level Gear category a bit redundant. However...

People talk about "level gear" all the time on the MUD. When they come here, I think that they ought to be able to find a page or category entitled "level gear." Nobody would think to look for "statistic gear" offhand.

However, str gear and dex gear are definitely not considered "level gear" and I thought that it would be techincally inaccurate to include them under this category; however, I thought that all five deserved to be in a single category, which is why I put all five under Statistic Gear.

So, I thought that a little redundancy would be advantageous in this case. What do you think?

--Dave Garber 01:47, 7 February 2007 (CST)

In any case, it's awfully dang easy to change and change back again with these Templates. I love 'em! Three cheers for MooNFisH!!! --Dave Garber 02:00, 7 February 2007 (CST)

Ok, how about this? Level Gear as a subcategory of Statistic gear. A link from the template to Stat & Level Gear. In there, the subcategory Level Gear shoud be clearly visible. But it's pointless to link to both Stat and Level gear separately from the template. --Llanor 05:09, 7 February 2007 (CST)
I favor putting these categories in parallel as they are, rather than putting one category underneath the other category. But, that's my personal preference and I may be a bit crazy. Waite and I had a similar difference of opinion about the Spellcasting Gear category. --Dave Garber 15:28, 7 February 2007 (CST)